Let be the mass, in grams, of a randomly chosen light bulb. Then , so the density is a symmetric bell curve centred at .
Part (ii)
1 mark
Standardising, with ,
, correct to 3 s.f.
Part (iii)
2 marks
Approach
“total mass of 4 randomly chosen empty boxes” is a sum of 4 independent normal random variables, not 4 times a single box’s mass — the mean scales by but the variance also scales by (not ), since the boxes are independent.
Let be the mass, in grams, of a randomly chosen empty box, so . Let be the total mass of 4 independently, randomly chosen empty boxes. Since the are independent,
, correct to 3 s.f.
Part (iv)
3 marks
Let be the total mass, in grams, of a randomly chosen light bulb together with a randomly chosen box. Assuming the bulb’s mass and the box’s mass are independent,
, correct to 3 s.f.
Part (v)
4 marks
Approach
the padding’s mass is of the bulb’s mass, i.e. — a fixed multiple of , not a separate independent random variable — so the total mass of box, bulb and padding is . We find the distribution of , then use the given tail probability to solve for .
Let be the total mass, in grams, of a box containing a bulb and its padding. Since and are independent,
We are given . Standardising,
By GC (inverse normal),
To check your answer: since , should be below the mean ; is indeed below . ✓
, correct to 3 s.f.
Part (vi)
3 marks
Approach
as in (iii), “total mass of 4 boxes, each containing a bulb and padding” sums 4 independent copies of from (v).
Let be the total mass of 4 independently, randomly chosen boxes, each containing a bulb and padding. Since the are independent,
, correct to 3 s.f.
This is how we mark, and how we teach.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.