The board has men and women, members in total. A chairperson, a secretary and a treasurer are three different roles, so choosing who fills them is an arrangement (order matters), not just a selection.
Part (i)
1 markSince all three roles are filled by women, we are arranging of the women into distinct roles: choices for chairperson, then for secretary, then for treasurer.
there are ways.
Part (ii)
3 marksApproach
“At least one is a woman and at least one is a man” is easiest by the complement: from all ways of filling the roles, remove the ways that are all men and the ways that are all women (these two cases are mutually exclusive and together are the complement of “at least one of each”).
The total number of ways to fill the roles from all members is
The number of ways with all roles filled by men is
and from part (i), the number of ways with all roles filled by women is .
there are ways.
Part (iii)
3 marksApproach
The members sit at random around a (circular) table, so we count circular arrangements, where only rotations of the same seating are identified (reflections are distinct, since swapping left and right neighbours gives a genuinely different seating). The total number of such arrangements of distinct people is . For the favourable outcomes, we treat the chairperson, secretary and treasurer as a single block, since they must sit in three adjacent places.
Treating the chairperson, secretary and treasurer as one block leaves objects (the block and the other members) to arrange around the table:
Within the block, the officers can be ordered in ways.
.
Part (iv)
3 marksApproach
“Separated from each other by at least one other person” means no two of the three officers are adjacent. Rather than working with the officers directly, we first seat the other members around the table, which creates gaps between consecutive members (a circular arrangement of people has such gaps); placing each officer into a different gap then guarantees no two officers are next to each other.
Seat the other members around the table first:
This creates gaps (one between each pair of adjacent members). Choose of these gaps for the officers, one officer per gap, and arrange the officers:
| To check your answer: ; here , leaving for the remaining case (exactly one pair adjacent, the third officer elsewhere), which is a sensible split. ✓ |
.