Part (i)
2 marksApproach
Write as a chain of operations applied to , starting from the inside (the that gets replaced) and working outwards to the factor multiplying the whole expression.
We first replace by , which translates the curve units in the positive -direction:
We then multiply the whole expression by , which scales the curve parallel to the -axis by factor :
the curve is translated units in the positive -direction, then scaled parallel to the -axis by factor .
Part (ii)
3 marksApproach
Before sketching, we check the value of at each piece boundary and, where a piece is not included at a boundary, note whether the point is actually attained (a jump) or only approached.
On , , a horizontal segment from to , both endpoints attained.
On , , part of an upward parabola with vertex . At (not included in this piece, but the value matches the flat segment already found):
So the curve comes in at with a corner (the gradient jumps from to there), then decreases to .
Otherwise, . For this gives a horizontal segment on the -axis, but at itself (the first piece applies), so there is a jump: approaches as but . For , , and since too, the curve meets this segment smoothly (no jump) at .

Note: the open circle at marks the value approached but not attained; is the actual value of .
Part (iii)
2 marksApproach
is scaled parallel to the -axis by factor (replacing by ), then translated unit in the positive -direction. The three break-points of at move to under the stretch; we only need the part of the new curve on .
For , i.e. : , so .
For , i.e. : , so
At (the right end of our domain):
Otherwise (in particular for ): , so ; but at itself, . As in part (ii), this is a jump: as , but .
