An equation of the form splits into two cases according to the sign of : where we solve , and where we solve . We first find where changes sign.
Since , this is zero at and , so for or , and for .
Case 1:or. Here , so
Since and , both roots lie in this case.
Case 2:. Here , so
giving or ; both lie in .
(All four values also satisfy , needed since the left side is non-negative.)
the exact roots are .
Part (ii)
4 marks
Approach
The graph of is the parabola reflected upward wherever it dips below the -axis, i.e. on , and left unchanged elsewhere. The reflected piece has the same vertex -coordinate as the original parabola.
The original parabola has vertex at , with value ; after reflection, the middle hump of has a maximum at . The graph touches the -axis (corners, not smooth turning points) at and , and its -intercept is .
The line has intercepts and .
Using the roots from (i), the graphs meet where , at
Hence: the inequality holds exactly where the curve lies strictly below the line. Reading this off the graph, the curve dips below the line on two intervals between consecutive intersections: from to , and from to (checking, e.g., gives curve line, and gives curve line, confirming both intervals; on the curve sits above the line, e.g. at , curve line).
or .
This is how we mark, and how we teach.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.