Part (i)
1 markA sample is random in this context if every biscuit bar produced that day has an equal chance of being selected for the sample, and bars are selected independently of one another.
Part (ii)
2 marksSince , and ,
the unbiased estimate of the population mean is , and the unbiased estimate of the population variance is (3 s.f.).
Part (iii)
5 marksLet be the population mean mass, in grams, of biscuit bars produced that day.
We test
at the significance level.
Approach
The population distribution of masses is not given, but is large, so by the Central Limit Theorem is approximately normal even though the population variance is unknown (and is estimated by ). This justifies a -test.
Under , since is large, by the Central Limit Theorem
Using a -test,
By GC, the -value is (3 s.f.).
Since , we do not reject .
at the level of significance, there is insufficient evidence that the mean mass of biscuit bars differs from grams, i.e. no evidence against the claim on the packets.
Part (iv)
2 marksExplanation: No need to know the population distribution because is large, so by the Central Limit Theorem the sample mean is approximately normally distributed whatever the underlying distribution of the individual bar masses is. This means the test in (iii) is valid (approximately) regardless of the population distribution.