Since cuts the axes at and , we have and . Only these two values of are known, so a point can be stated only when the transformed curve’s axis-crossing depends on at or alone.
Part (i)
-intercept: , giving .
-intercept: at , , giving .
Part (ii)
-intercept: , giving .
-intercept: at , , which is not one of the given values of , so it is not possible to state this point.
Part (iii)
-intercept: , giving .
-intercept: at , , again not determinable, so it is not possible to state this point.
Part (iv)
4 marks
Since exists, its graph is the reflection of in the line , so every point on gives a point on . Since and lie on , the points and lie on .
cuts the axes at and .
Part (b)(i)
2 marks
Explanation: is defined by , and at the denominator , so is undefined there. Hence must be excluded from the domain of .
Part (b)(ii)
4 marks
Approach
It is easier to simplify into a single fraction first, then substitute this simplified form into itself for , rather than composing the original unsimplified expression with itself.
Using this simplified form,
So for : is its own inverse.
To find , let and solve for in terms of .
Replacing by :
To check your answer: since for all in the domain, is self-inverse, so must equal — and indeed the formula obtained for below is identical to . ✓
and .
Part (b)(iii)
2 marks
Using and from part (ii), the equation becomes
Both values satisfy , so both lie in the domain.
or .
This is how we mark, and how we teach.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full, with the reasoning written out and the traps named.