Part (i)
2 marksLet be the common difference. Using with , :
the common difference is .
Part (ii)
4 marksApproach
The given equation has in it, so it must come from the geometric sum formula , which is only valid for . We derive the equation by clearing the denominator, and this is exactly the step that can introduce as a spurious root, since multiplying both sides by is not reversible at .
Since , the sum of the first 13 terms of the geometric progression is
Substituting : , so does satisfy this equation algebraically. However, the equation was derived by multiplying the sum formula (valid only for ) through by , which introduces as an extraneous root of the cleared equation. Directly, if every term of the progression equals , so . So cannot be the actual common ratio, even though it is a root of .
By GC, the real roots of are (rejected, as shown) and
the possible values of the common ratio are or (3 s.f.).
Part (iii)
3 marksSince the common ratio is positive, (retaining the unrounded GC value from part (ii)). The th term of the geometric progression is ; the th term of the arithmetic progression is . The given condition is
By GC, tabulating both sides for consecutive integer :
At : , while — inequality not satisfied.
At : , while — inequality satisfied.
| To check your answer: the geometric term grows like with while the arithmetic side grows only linearly in , so once the geometric term overtakes it near it should stay ahead for all larger — consistent with exceeding (42nd A.P. term) by a growing margin. ✓ |
the smallest possible value of is .