2024 A-Level · Paper 1 · Question 1
An asymptote and a turning point are all you are given, and from them three unknown constants have to fall out. The quotient rule looks like the expensive step — but at a turning point only its numerator matters, and the value that numerator needs has already been worked out one line earlier. Beside the solution, the curve itself, with on a slider.
The graph of , with , , non-zero constants, has an asymptote at and a turning point at . Find the values of , and .
Approach
Three unknowns need three equations, and the question hands you exactly three facts: a vertical asymptote, a point the curve passes through, and a zero gradient at that point. Turn each into an equation in , , — in that order, because the second one produces a number that makes the third almost free.
The asymptote — the denominator vanishes there
A vertical asymptote at means the denominator is zero at (and the numerator is not, since ):
Multiplying through by 4:
The point on the curve
Substituting , :
Note — keep that 9 in view
Equation (2) says the denominator of the original function takes the value at . That is not just an equation to solve later; it is a number the next step needs. Reading it that way turns the quotient rule into one line of arithmetic.
The turning point — only the numerator matters
Writing for the denominator, the quotient rule gives
At a turning point , and a fraction is zero exactly when its numerator is — the denominator is safely non-zero at , since is not the asymptote. So it is enough that
At the two pieces are from (2), and . Therefore
Solving the three
From (3), . Substituting into (1) and (2):
Equating the two expressions for :
and then , .
To check your answer:
The denominator becomes , which is zero at ✓. At , ✓. And the numerator of there is ✓ — all three conditions hold.
, , .
Where the marks go
Differentiating the quotient and then simplifying the whole thing is the slow road — and the algebra it creates is where sign errors live. At a turning point you only ever need the numerator. The other loss is treating "asymptote at " as a statement about the whole function rather than about the denominator alone.
Not required by the question — but a graph you can picture is a graph you can check, and this one takes ten seconds to sketch once , and are known.
With the constants found, the function is
so it carries two vertical asymptotes, and ; a horizontal asymptote , since the denominator outgrows the numerator; and it cuts the axes at and . Besides the given minimum at there is a second stationary point, a maximum at , which the same numerator condition finds:
giving , so or — the point already given, and one more.
To check your answer:
The question said "a turning point at ", not "the turning point" — and indeed there are two. That the given one drops straight out of the general condition is the strongest confirmation that the constants are right.
Every Ten-Year Series question, worked in full — with the reasoning written out, the traps named, and the curves you can actually take hold of.