Part (a)
3 marksThe sales manager wants to test only whether the tyres last longer than miles (a specific direction), not merely whether the life span differs from miles in either direction. This one-directional claim is why a -tail test is appropriate.
Let thousand miles be the population mean life span of the front tyres.
where the test is carried out at the significance level.
a -tail test is appropriate, with tested against at the level of significance.
Part (b)
2 marksWith , and , we find the unbiased estimates from the coded data.
the unbiased estimate of the population mean is thousand miles, and the unbiased estimate of the population variance is (thousand miles) (3 s.f.).
Part (c)
3 marksSince is large, by the Central Limit Theorem is approximately normal even though the population distribution of tyre life spans is not stated. Under ,
Using the sample data, the test statistic is
For a -tail test at the level, the critical value is , i.e. the critical region is .
| To check your answer: since , the test statistic does not fall in the critical region, consistent with being only modestly above relative to the spread of the data. ✓ |
Since , we do not reject .
there is insufficient evidence, at the level of significance, to conclude that the mean life span of front tyres is more than miles.
Part (d)
1 markThe test in (c) would no longer be valid.
Explanation: with only tyres, the sample is too small for the Central Limit Theorem to guarantee that is approximately normal. Since the population distribution of tyre life spans is not given to be normal, can no longer be assumed approximately normal, so the -test in (c) breaks down.
the test would be inappropriate, since the Central Limit Theorem no longer applies for a sample of only tyres.